Read what the EEOC doesn’t want you to know:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50777732 Lawsuit against EEOC Leadership for Race discrimination Fraud and misconduct
Ricardo Jones v. Jacqueline Berrien et al (EEOC Fraud against the Public)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged Corruption, EEOC, illegal, misconduct, roque attorneys/manager/law firms.. Bookmark the permalink.
Ricohenry7's Blog 
One of America’s deep and darkest secrets is employment discrimination in the workplace.
Individuals all across the country are complaining about employment discrimination by going to the EEOC and filing charges of discrimination. Mr. Ishimaru then acting chair of EEOC shouldn’t be worried about how the Agency will handle race (Black) charges in the future. EEOC’s statistical data shows that it is doing a miserable job in the present to eradicate employment discrimination in the workplace. During the past 13 years from FY 1997 through FY 2009 race and sex charges represents most of the charges filed with the EEOC. An analysis of the EEOC’s all statutes enforced by the Agency (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, & EPA) shows that for the period FY 1997 to 2009, it received approximately 1,066,225 charges of which it issued 683,803 (64.1) “No Reasonable Cause” findings and 68,028 (6.4%) “Reasonable Cause” findings. The statistics just for FY 2009 shows that EEOC received 93.277 charges of discrimination. Of these figures it issued 52,360 (69.9%) “No Reasonable Cause” findings and 3,904 (4.5%) “Reasonable Cause” findings. EEOC for FY-2010 received 99.922 charges of which it issued 67,520 (64.3%) “No Reasonable Cause” findings and 4,981 (4.7%) “Reasonable Cause” findings. EEOC would like to make the general public believe it is “slamming” and “jamming,” when it comes to protecting the civil rights of aggrieved individuals. However, its statistics tells a different story. The statistical data are available on the Agency’s website at http://www.eeoc.gov. Ms. Berrien the current chair of EEOC answer to the above??? Each investigator dismiss 50 extra complaints on top of what investigators were dismissing anyway.
EEOC is a advocate for corporate american. There’s a conspiracy between government lawyers and respondent law firms ie: Jackson Lewis/Proskauer Rose and many others. They create work and fix decisions for personal gain. Chair of the EEOC Ms. Berrien was confirmed (by senator Tom Harkin) now she must dismiss all Black complaints and others. The corrupt EEOC union has now withdrawn their ULP against same to FLRA. The ULP(questioned the timing of extra (50) dismissals per investigator) and FLRA is a joke to start with. Denial and/or dismissing all race(Black)discrimination complaints nationwide won’t save the economy. If this criminal action was done to any other group but Black people the public wouldn’t accept this governmental misconduct ie: SEC, SALLY MAE. So much illegal money and positions both government and private sector are involved.
The Presidents appointee Jacqueline Berrien chair of EEOC is supporting “JIM-CROW II LAWS” at the Rogue EEOC. Black people are not equally qualified for employment by the non-enforcement of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 as amended by the EEOC. This is what Ms. Berrien has brought to the EEOC nation wide. Ms. Berrien has required the dismissal of a additional 50 complaint per investigator at all EEOC office. If any investigator refuses to dismiss the additional 50 complaints they with be disciplined.
If the rule of law applys to all then why not file charges against the Rogue EEOC. The Rogues at the EEOC have recieved something to side with Respondents and other Rogues agencies??? The connection between the former vice chair Leslie Silverman and Proskauser Rose LLP her present employer is clear. Jackson Lewis’ influence at the Rogue EEOC using ADR as a cover to fix cases is clear. Then why hasn’t the attorney general Eric Holder and/or Asst US attorney Ms. London for the southern district of NYS filed charges against the Rogues attorney’s and managers at the EEOC???
This is a petition for Congress to investigate EEOC and reinstate Mr. Ricardo Jones, to the position he held at the time of his release with full back benefits and full back pay.
http://petitiontoinvestigate.blogspot.com
This is a petition for Congress to investigate EEOC and reinstate Mr. Ricardo Jones, to the position he held at the time of his release with full back benefits and full back pay.
The evidence in the petition links to the Ricardo Jones story and links to a State agency that has been wasting millions of dollars and man hours on an Anti-Union schemes and a cover-up schemes linked to a conflict of interest, specifically Mr. Thomas Perez, now the Assistant Attorney General, of the Civil Rights Division, for the DOJ
If you have info to add to this request for an investigation of EEOC by U.S. CONGRESS let us know …NOW IS THE TIME
We all must contact the Senate Committee Headed by Senator Tom Harkin Democrate from (IA) and Subcommettee Chair Patty Murray from Washington State (Democrate) Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions about the corruption, misconduct, Fraud and illegal relationship with the Law Firms of Proskauer Rose LLP, Jackson Lewis LLP and other law firms. The dismissal of valid workplace discrimination complaints as ordered by EEOC Chair Jacqueline Berrien. (SEE Topics by Ricohenry7) The above have been commited by EEOC, OSC, MSPB, FLRA, DOL and DOJ office of civil rights. We the people need a Civi Rights Zar who the people trust and who has the power to terminate the above individuals who committed prohibited practices and illegal acts of corruption and reform the above.
428 Senate Dirksen Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
202-224-5375
Tom Harkin told Jacqueline Berrien to do something about the backlog of complaints against small businesses!!!
List of Committee members all Senators:
Democrats by Rank
Tom Harkin (IA)
Barbara A. Mikulski (MD)
Jeff Bingaman (NM)
Patty Murray (WA)
Bernard Sanders (I) (VT)
Robert P. Casey, Jr. (PA)
Kay R. Hagan (NC)
Jeff Merkley (OR)
Al Franken (MN)
Michael F. Bennet (CO)
Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)
Richard Blumenthal (CT)
Republicans by Rank
Michael B. Enzi (WY)
Lamar Alexander (TN)
Richard Burr (NC)
Johnny Isakson (GA)
Rand Paul (KY)
Orrin G. Hatch (UT)
John McCain (AZ)
Pat Roberts (KS)
Lisa Murkowski (AK)
Mark Kirk (IL)
WHY I BELIEVE RICARDO JONES (Posted on Undercoverlawyer.com)
-these are exerpts from former EEOC investigator Ricardo Jones;
“Proskauer Rose LLP donating money to Clyde Lo-chin’s Steel drum club.
Clyde Lo chin admitted to me that he asked Paul Salvator to have Polo to donate $5000.00 to his Clyde’s Steel Drum club and he did.
– why is this important to me? I will tell you why: In 2007 I filled an ADA discrimination case with FEPA in Palm Beach County, my complaint was eventually forwarded to the Miami EEOC.
After being asked whether or not I was “gay” by the EEOC Investigator, when I said “yes” I was repeatedly told that I would not be helped. When I asked why, I was told “because I am not going to help you”. I pursued the case anyways.
During the investigation and several days before I was fired a coworker told me that I was going to lose my case because my employer was “donating” money to the Alzheimers Association NYC Chapter in the name of the EEOC Investigator for her late dad. I didn’t believe it at the time, but later found this: http://www.alznyc.org/newsletter/fall2006/24a.asp -it contains the same name of the investigator along with a male with the same last name.
later I remembered being invited to a Baptist Church in Miami by my co-workers. In never attended because as a gay man.. well lets just say I did not feel comfortable with the idea. Not to mention I was like 100 miles away.
Later I discovered that the EEOC Investigator that was “handling”my case is not only the Treasurer of said Church, she purchased a $500,00.00 house in her name along with the name of the Pastor of said church.
Now I understand the Idea of “religious freedom” and I admitedly am not the smartest person, but this just sounds all kinds of wrong.
Unfortunately, after I filled my complaint I was injured at work, my and workers comp attorney brokered a “deal” during a WC deposition. I tried to drop the WC case because I found another job out of state and was in danger of becoming homeless.
I was told that if I did not settle both cases on the spot I would have to wait for court date.
Long story short, It was in my best interest to settle with workers comp because my new boss said I could not start the new job until it was settled.
-so two years later when Ricardo Jones says EEOC Investigators are on the take, I believe EEOC Investigators are on the take.
http://www.nationalblackagendaonline.com/RicardoJones.html.
In June 2008, Plaintiff (Ricardo Jones) former Senior Federal Investigator EEOC-NYDO was assigned a charge of discrimination to investigate filed by Charging Party, Robert Johnson, a black male custodian, against the New Rochelle City School District. The majority of the students enrolled at the site of the charge are African-Americans and Hispanics. The majority of the staff belongs to the same ethnic. When Mr. Johnson transferred from the administrative office where he held the position of custodian, to the school; he notice three hangman’s knots (Nooses) with a brown monkey (curse george) in the one of the nooses. Mr. Johnson made a complaint to the Acting Superintendent, a black male, but nothing was done initially to resolve it. Mr. Johnson continued protest the hangman’s knots (Nooses) and he removed them himself; however, The White male supervisor put two more nooses up again in public view for everyone to see. Mr. Johnson took pictures of the hangman’s knots (Nooses) and gave them to Jones. Jones conducted an on-site investigation for two days.
In interviewing employees, Jones discovered that other discriminatory practices had occurred at the Middle School and that the hangman’s knots had been on display for a period of seven (7) years. The Acting Superintendent (Black Ph’D) told Jones that an investigation was conducted, but it was not done by him; plus he did not sign-off on the report. He also told Jones that he didn’t know who place his signature on the investigative report. The Acting Superintendent promised plaintiff, when he returned from his honeymoon, he would provide an affidavit. However, when he returned, he was promoted to Superintendent at another school within the district and failed to submit an affidavit.
On June 26, 2008, Nancy Boyd, Deputy District Director, informed Jones that he was being investigated for misconduct. Respondent’s attorney wanted Jones taken off the case because he knew the evidence that Jones discovered during the course of the investigation was going to be damaging to his client. Ricardo Jones was terminated for protecting Black and Hispanic childrens lives and civil rights.
I need your help. Please send this to all who can fight for our people.
http://smileyandwest.ning.com/video/eeoc-fired-senior-eeo
Ricardo Jones
Mayor Bloomberg is allowing the construction companies of DeFoe and Conti to steal millions of city dallors along with the corrupt EEOC. Both DeFoe and Conti have been investigated by the corrupt EEOC for gender discrimination. The president white house staff also has a gender discrimination problem too (Confidence Man) by Suskind. The countries civil rights laws are used to make illegal money by the elite officials. Great Con Game. kou do’s to the Mayor of NYC and the President. Can anyone stop them? Where’s are free press???
If the president is politician and not a leader then we have made a BIG mistake. He’s supposed to be the leader of this country and the free world. I don’t care that the president looks Black. No passes for Black people in this life and/or this world. What we must have is a proven strong leader as president. The president has no record of leading anything but a short career as a junior senator and a community organizer. C4C is possibly one of the only groups that could bring about real change for our people Black people and this country. The administration is acting out of Panic. The country is close to possible Anarchy. The ruling class will do and are doing as the Nazi did in Germany. They must blame some group for the problems of this country sooner or later. Which group will end up like the Jew’s of WWII Europe?
Some may take this the wrong way but we’re either part of the problem or part of the solution. This country was founded on Racism and Racism is destroying this society.
Power of the people
Ricardo Jones
http://eeoccorruption.blogspot…
Stop Government corruption: SEE BELOW:
http://www.livestream.com/lawlessamerica?utm_source=lsplayer&utm_medium=embed&utm_campaign=footerlinks
The EEOC’s excuse for all their corruption and fraud accepted by the public and media from the adminstration (Obama) is backlog of Black complaints. The EEOC was budgeted for overtime. Please read the following:
This is the agency’s submission to the arbitrator. Go to page 73 for some interesting reading. The document is about 200 pages so don’t copy unless you have a ream of paper:
Click to access 20081022aggybrfs-p.pdf
..
List of all the Bigots, Racist and Uncle Toms/Aunt Jamin Momas of the Federal Government:
http://www.coalition4change.org/RMO.htm
This list will be updated as needed.
Power of the People.
We will not support the president (obama) on anything until he addresses Civil Rights for Black People and reforms same. We want the resignation of Jacqueline Berrien EEOC chair immediately or he will hear from US Black People at the election. NO more passes for the president because he looks Black and has a Black wife and daughters. We will march, call for a government work slow-down, boycott corporation/companies, businesses and the government. Civil disobedience if necessary. This is a promise
None of the current Black leaders are concerned about civil rights corruption at the federal level because they’re all taking some form of kickbacks. Maxine Water Representative from Compton Ca, was interviewed by Donald Winkfield of Black Star News this month (December) and she said the EEOC is not investigating Black complaints because of the lack of Budget. This is a lie to cover-up for the corruption at the EEOC. Mr. Winkfield told Maxine Waters that the EEOC is dismissing all Black complaints and he has a Senior Federal Investigator who has evidence and witnessed same. Maxine Waters didn’t ask to speak to Ricardo Jones. All of the Black politicians are in on the gaming of Black people. Many of the Black elite accept the corruption against their own people and benefit from same. See Fear does different things to different people. Elite Blacks earn a well paid living from white bigots. Elite Blacks will never bite the hand that feeds them. When the elite Blacks are finally forced to confront racism and lose they cave-in totally and just accept the condition that has feed them all the time. Our real enemy are the elite Blacks. Don’t take me wrong we as Black people need to unite under Pan-Africanism which means: African Americans, Blacks from Caribian and South America, All Blacks from Africa must vote as a block just like other ethnic groups ie: Jews, Irish, Italians, Asians, latins and others. We must force obama to include a PLANK in his re-election platform which addresses our concerns “JOBS and a RIGHT TO WORK IN A HOSTILE FREE WORK ENVIRONMENT and enforce all current laws reference same and update/reform same.
If obama doesn’t then we will vote against him (obama) and any politician who supports him (obama). None of this the devil I know verse the Devil I don’t know BS. We don’t have much time to do this or it will be four more years of YES WE CAN which lead to what???
The Black community will not survive as little corrupt white people . This is the position of the Black elite. Once again if you replace a Bad white COP with a Bad Black COP we accomplish nothing. Because they both beat heads for the same reasons??? Steve Biecko a GREAT Black Leader of South Africians said this and was killed for it and for standing up of his peoples (Blacks) rights. For the those who don’t know who Steve Beicko is Danzel Washington played Steve Beicko in the GREAT GREAT movie “CRY FREEDOM” which was made to show the conversion of a White liberal editor from South Africa Donald Woods. Look it up.
Power of the people.
OBAMA’S EEOC (1) AND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE BLACK AMERICAN …
MR. RICARDO JONES, SR. is a veteran and the former Senior Federal Investigator for the new York District of the EEOC from 2001 to 2010. He describes how …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqyrvRaY4Ks – Cached
.Play Video
Skin color among Black people: http://youtu.be/VFLiDyKRlAo
..
Harry Belafonte on president obama: http://youtu.be/AwdlpdCcXZo
Blogtalk interview of Ricardo Jones former EEOC Senior Federal Investigator exposes corruption at the EEOC with Chit chat (Barbie)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqyrvRaY4Ks
This information is more powerful than “Watergate of the 1970’s”. Thats why many are trying to make this about Ricardo Jones. The public has been lied to by obama and his handlers. The right to work in a hostile free work environment is a fundamental right and the bedrock of this country. Once the president engages in this corruption and fraud against the public this raises to level of high crimes and misdemeanors? Which means what? The president did appoint his wife’s friend (Ms. Berrien) from Harvard law school to head the corrupt and/or rogue EEOC correct? The president when he was the only Black/White looking senator was on the Subcommittee on Employment an Workplace Safety correct? The president is a Harvard Law Professor correct? The EEOC is a Rogues agency correct? Whom benefits from this corruption? Attorneys and Bad employers correct?
How many executives orders have the president signed reference to the Rogue EEOC. The key to EPA is the hiden salaries which the government has Federal and/or State taxes and (W-2 forms) correct? Did the president’s executive order for Ms. ledetter state the aforementioned NO!
Has Tavis Smiley or Ph’d (Dr) Cornel West ever pointed out the above? NO. This is too important to all Americans to make fun of it correct?
REFORM CIVIL RIGHTS NOW AND FIRE JACQUELINE BERRIEN TODAY IF WE LIVE IN A FREE COUNTRY OR IS THIS A DICTATORSHIP???
Ricardo E. Jones Sr.
Former Senior Federal Investigator EEOC-NYDO
US Army Retired, MSG/RA Bronze Star Medal
POWER OF THE PEOPLE
To whom it may concern: Its clear that you are involved in the conspiracy to allow the current administration to steal and commit fraud against the public to make up for past injustices against Black people. The Black elitist and/or others are being allowed to steal from the public without fear of the rule of law applying to them. This is to notify you we will expose you also.
Power of the People
Ricardo E. Jones SR.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/She-s-At-it-Again-Wyneva-by-Ward-Jordan-111204-628.html
This trial is an injustice against all Black people. White racist Bigots at HHS contracting deverting 30% of set a side ear marked contracts from Historic Black colleges and universities to others they friends and non-Black colleges. Contact the adminstration and Katheen Sebelius head of HHS an Obama appointee to answer How, Why and to account for all funds deverted from HBCU’s and to reinstate Holms-Martin with all pay and benefits immediately.
Ricardo Jones
Ikalean,
Please forgive me for getting into this discussion so late, but I only recently received membership and I couldn’t keep quiet as I consider the situation in our country to be quite serious. I hear you and I understand your concerns about what Tavis and Doctor West are doing, especially as they are considered to be his traditional “base” of supporters. But I think a larger issue is getting lost here.
While there can be short-term damage to President Obama to have criticism thrown at him from his own presumed constituency, it is also important to recognize that as our President, he is an elected official, and has accountability. The process of election comes from making promises, taking positions, and expressing an agenda, so that voters know what to expect from him if he wins. I’m stating this obvious fact because often in our enthusiasm and passion for having a black family in the White House we forget that Democracy remains healthy and intact only when we question and challenge our elected officials. To defend or support our leaders unconditionally leads to a recipe for unchecked power, which will corrupt anyone.
The other problem we face is that Obama is surrounded by and hit with criticism from the Right constantly and it makes us defensive of him, rightly so. But it also means he is forced to compromise and cater to interests who have not elected him. Defending him does not ensure he will defend our rights or the programs that bring minorities and poor people to a level playing field with the privileged classes in this country. Washington is an ugly place. Just ask Jack Abramoff. I am assuming you voted for Obama not because of his color, but because his stated agenda was sympathetic to your concerns.
In reality, the agenda that he laid out hasn’t been enacted, and in some ways we have lost more civil rights and economic power under Obama than under Bush. No one should expect 100% return on campaign promises, even amorphous ones like hope and change. But look at the NDAA, the continuance of the Patriot Act, the pardoning of AT&T for illegal wire-tapping, the assasination and detention of U.S Citizens, the refusal to prosecute Wall Street criminals or any Bush administation official for their war crimes and you will see how the state of our democracy is under attack. You could view this as the nature of politics. But even Obama stated on election day that change could be made only by all of us pulling together and creating the change we want to see. You bring about change in your life in your way, and Tavis and Doctor West take another strategy by raising issues in the public sphere that would otherwise go ignored in this contentious political climate.
What they are doing, IMHO, is changing the tone of the conversation by pointing to issues that American citizens, regardless of color, deal with, i.e. speaking truth to power.
Right now the mainstream media has its lens continually focused on the agenda of right wing adherents who claim entitlement programs, terrorist threats, debt, and immigrants are ruining this country. Nothing could be further from the truth, I think you could agree with that. However, the establishment and its media would choose to focus strictly on these issues because it makes the Obama Administration look weak and “wrong”.
If he caves in to the calls for cutting the social safety net, ramping up the war machine for more attacks in the Middle East, giving corporations, religious institutions and the rich even more rights and powers than they already have, how will that help you? Will he even be your President anymore?
There is already ample evidence that his is not “our” president, but the official who serves the banks and financial services industry, who want as little change as possible. Only when he serves OUR interests can we truly say he is our president. Money is a powerful motivator, but speech can be just a powerful. Numbers count. If you rally people for your cause and call attention to the numerous crises this country actually faces, that is not “bothering” or attacking the President, it is our responsibility and duty as citizens in a democracy. This fight is bigger than black on black issues. The Health Care Program was a massive cave-in to the Pharmaceutical and Health Insurance industries and they will profit immensely from it, while the Public Option will remain anemic and largely underfunded if it even gets implemented. The tax incentive is a short term solution that will damage us long-term since the payroll tax is how we fund Social Security.
The real battle we face, as you have discussed is for the future of our children. If you love them, please understand that unflinching support of someone who is betraying your interests will NOT bode well for that future. If Tavis and Dr. West didn’t bring the issues of poverty and income inequality to the national discussion, who would have done it? If we still supported the President, and under pressure from the Right and its faithful media (i.e. Fox News), he dismantled our much needed social programs, defunded education, ratched up the War Machine to an even higher level, and violated our Civil Liberties in the name of “National Security” who benefits? Only the Right, and only the richest among them.
Please ask yourself, “When I or my loved ones become homeless and lose access to healthcare, when education becomes so dismal that my children can barely read or write, when our comunities become so impoverished that criminal activity is the number one economic market that rules my streets, can I still in good faith support my President since he is black?” Community work is vital, but we have enough sense to understand we should be doing that regardless. This shouldn’t let the President off the hook for his responsibilities.
Obama can handle the criticism. He’s an adult and understands the problems of being the highest profiled and most powerful official in the world. But the office he holds must be examined for its use and abuse of power. Other officials are there because they also represent powerful interests who want things to continue to go their way – or else. Without the voice of the vulnerable and weaker members of society being represented in Washington and on the National scene, who do you think he will be forced to listen to?
This is a war for the future of our country, and we won’t win by leaving Obama alone. He challenged us to bother him on election day, he asked that we hold him accountable, because the other side will certainly do worse. Public discourse is a largely misunderstood and underused tool that the mainstream media uses to great affect, partially because they downplay its significance. But we are all affected by it. It must be challenged and changed, because winning hearts and minds is what politics and power is all about. Too often we forget that and that is exactly what those in power want us to do.
Please step back for a moment and remember that this game is a winner-take-all situation. We can’t let up on Obama any more than the thousands of corporate and big money lobbyists in Washington are letting up on him – and they never will.
Reply by Bennetta 3 hours ago
When I clicked on that ABC story that referenced Sharpton, near the bottom of the article it infers something else too that I really HOPE is not true of Sharpton.
BACK TO OBAMA….
To be clear, Obama has been a disaster for Civil Rights, Civil Liberties and in part the Economy. He not only retained most of Bush’s REPUBLICAN policies but actually expanded and/or extended them hence the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, Drones, unauthorized Wars (Libya), NDAA….who knew he loved militancy so much?! As a Democrat, I certainly did not which is why I voted for him back in 2008 bc I thought he was a DEMOCRAT with democratic values and hence a democratic agenda to include democratic policies for ALL and yes that includes minorities and specifically BLACK communities & THEIR concerns too. Nonetheless, it appears I and so many other millions of democratic constituents were simply WRONG or shall I say “mislead” to believe that Obama would represent the Left view once in the WH, whereas he instead, shifted from Left to CENTRIST to now appearing to lean Right…certainly not what Democratic voters voted for in 2008….he should NOW be running on the Republican ticket along with the rest because truth be told Obama scares me just as much as those Republicans do!
So to ALL who say FOUR MORE YEARS, my response is “ok but this time tell me EXACTLY how will such a vote benefit ME and MY COMMUNITY and OUR concerns?”
Corruption at the EEOC NY Knicks vs Anucha BrownBy thinkiq| 1 video
OBAMA IS THE PRODUCT OF THE DALY MECHINE AND LASALLE STREET BUSINESS MEN NOT A COMMUNITY ORIGANIZNER OF CHICARGO BLACK’S. HE MARRIED INTO THE ROBERSON FAMILY (Michelle Roberson-Obama) who maybe in-laws of the Jesse Jackson Family. The Roberson and Jackson families are precinct Bosses in Chicargo (Real Estate). Ph. D West know’s this and has only been telling us what he wants. The question is why wher we lied to by the Black Elite, Media both Black and White, and are leaders both Black and White???
WE WANT REFORM OF CIVIL RIGHTS FOR BLACK PEOPLE AND THE IMMEDIATE FIRING OF JACQUELINE BERRIEN CHAIR OF THE ROGUE AND/OR CORRUPT EEOC .
The real concerns of who we are as a ethnic group (Black people) revolves around the exploitation and manipulation of the Black poor and/or the Black working class. The Black middle class have become what they believe to be the Black Elite by titles. The Black Intellectuals have been around from and before reconstruction. We all evolved from the Black poor as a result of some form of Slavery. During Slavery there was the House Negro’s and the Field Negro’s.
Today we still have the same groups the Black Elitist and Black Intellectuals are the House Negro’s and Black poor and Black working class are the Field Negro’s. The House Negro’s have forgotten where they come from originally the Black poor.
Many of the House Negro’s pretend to be concern about the Field Negro’s but this is just smoke and mirrors. The question is where and/or whom are the Field Negro’s and are they moving up to become House Negro’s? Are the Field Negro’s just being eliminated and replaced with others?
The issues that affect us as Black Americans are accountability for all to include the Black Elite and/or Black Intellectuals and the president. If were going to make exceptions for the Black Elite and/or Black Intellectuals then we have only copied and accepted the white racist system. Then we must find someone to oppress to be true little racist bigots. Whom will that be? Corruption, Racism and Bigotry all go with the system we’re inheriting from our oppressors. Is this what we inherited from our grand parents and pass on to our grand children?
Ricardo
Confusion in the Black Community.
First we must identify the different social levels in the Black community.
1. Black Poor
2. Black working class
3. Black elitist and/or the former middle class
4. Black intellectuals
Second we must identify Pan-Africa.
1. Blacks from/born in Africa
2. Blacks from/born in south American and Caribbean
3. Blacks from/born in north American
The above shows just a few of the social economical differences among Black people. Some of the other dividing factors are age, color, mixture of white blood and language abilities. The most important issue in the Black community is social status, not Job’s, education and/or equal protection under the law. We have reached a point where titles and/or degree’s and position are our driving force in life. Some of US Black people were raised to be the best at what ever we aspired to be. Others among US have accepted to be just as corrupt as our oppressor. Today we hold positions of status not true power because power has corrupted US as it did our oppressor. Power in the hands of a child is dangerous as our oppressor believe. This is why today’s decisions are similar to our oppressors. Today we oppress ourselves out of fear of what our former and present oppressor may think. The laws of the country no longer apply to US Black people made clear by the lack of enforcement by the local, state and federal government. Today we fear to hold the president accountable for anything to avoid the criticism of the far right. What lies can we tell ourselves to believe this can lead to a prosperous future for our children and grand children.
This is how White Bigots took over the EEOC from Black Bigots. Bigots v. Bogots at the EEOC.
Joseph Ray Terry had all the right credentials: as a lawyer, he had spent many years fighting discrimination against minorities. His employer, the EEOC, had consistently given Mr. Terry “superior” and “excellent” performance reviews. But Mr. Terry was white, and he was forced to repeatedly sue the EEOC in order to win a promotion for which he had been applying for over 10 years!
Mr. Terry is a white, Louisiana-trained lawyer. In 1984 he submitted his first application within EEOC to become a district director for EEOC. Over the next 10 years EEOC repeatedly turned Terry down because he is white, and EEOC promoted many “disadvantaged minorites” ahead of Mr. Terry, one of whom did not even have a high school diploma
This is the get out of jail free card which allows the EEOC to commit crimes, frauds and take bribes. The president can correct this with an executive order if he’s honest.
When individuals file lawsuits against the EEOC for alleged fraud, neglience, and other impropriety in processing their respective discrimination charges, the court has ruled against the plaintiff asserting the following: Congress has not authorized, either expressly or impliedly, a cause of action against the EEOC for the EEOC’s alleged negligence or other malfeasance in processing an employment discrimination. See Smith v. Casella, 119 F. 3d.
Whistleblower Exposes Fraud at EEOC | DeWitt Clinton Express on …
blip.tv/dewitt-clinton…/whistelblower-exposes-fraud-at-eeoc-603947…Mar 21, 2012 – Based upon his investigation, Donald Winkfield discusses with Bill Murawski the expose at the EEOC thanks to a whistleblower who was in a …
http://blip.tv/dewitt-clinton-express/whistelblower-exposes-fraud-at-eeoc-6039472
Please distribute this video exposing the “UGLY TRUTH” about the EEOC.
Thank you Ricardo for you contribution to this video.
Message flagged Friday, October 19, 2012 9:31 AM Obama Makes False Claim About Supreme Court Decision; Fact-Checkers Parrot It
by Hans Bader on October 17, 2012 · 2 comments
in Economy, Employment, Features, Labor, Legal
Reading a Supreme Court decision is so hard! If you are a fact-checker, it’s much easier just to let President Obama, a critic of a Supreme Court decision, caricature the decision and then parrot the baseless caricature as if it were fact.
The Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., said employees who want to bring a pay discrimination lawsuit under Title VII (the federal antidiscrimination law with the shortest deadline) generally have to file a complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days. But it specifically left open the possibility they could sue later on – even if they failed to file a timely EEOC complaint — if they did not discover the discrimination until later. The case involved Lilly Ledbetter, who waited more than five years after learning of a pay disparity between her and her male co-workers to file an EEOC complaint.
The White House falsely claimed “The Court ruled that employees subject to pay discrimination like Lilly Ledbetter must file a claim within 180 days of the employer’s original decision to pay them less . . . even if the employee did not discover the discriminatory reduction in pay until much later (check out Justice Alito’s arguments in the Court’s opinion).” In yesterday’s debate, Obama falsely claimed the Supreme Court said Ledbetter could not sue even if she had no way of discovering the discriminatory pay disparity. He said “the Supreme Court said that she couldn’t bring suit because she should have found about it earlier, whereas she had no way of finding out about it.”
These claims are utterly false. The Supreme Court specifically left open the possibility employees who learn of the discrimination later can sue under the “discovery rule” exception to the 180-day deadline. In footnote 10 of its opinion, the Court wrote, “We have previously declined to address whether Title VII suits are amenable to a discovery rule. . . .Because Ledbetter does not argue that such a rule would change the outcome in her case, we have no occasion to address this issue.”
Thus, since Ledbetter didn’t even claim in her lawsuit she hadn’t discovered the pay discrimination in time to sue, relaxing the deadline for her would have done her no good. In addition, if she truly had lacked knowledge of the pay disparity as a result of being deceived by her employer, she could have had the deadline extended under the Supreme Court’s doctrines of equitable tolling and estoppel, which are longstanding exceptions to the deadline that are a bit narrower than the discovery rule. But she didn’t allege either of these exceptions applied in her case.
In reality, Ledbetter knew of the pay disparity she later claimed was discriminatory for over five years before filing a legal complaint over it, as she admitted in her deposition in her lawsuit. But later, Ledbetter falsely claimed to the contrary in a speech to the Democratic National Convention.
It’s not true, as she claimed to the Convention, that she didn’t learn of it until “two decades” after she began working at the company. She had worked for the company since 1979. She learned of the pay disparity by 1992, as excerpts from her deposition, filed in the Supreme Court as part of the Joint Appendix, make clear. In response to the question: “So you knew in 1992 that you were being paid less than your peers?” she answered simply, “Yes, sir.” (See Joint Appendix at pg. 233; page 123 of Ledbetter’s deposition.) But she did not file a legal complaint over it until July 1998, shortly before her retirement in November 1998. See Ledbetter v. Goodyear, 550 U.S. 618, 621 (2007).
Politifact parroted Obama’s false claim in an Oct. 16 commentary entitled “Obama: Mitt Romney refused to say whether he supports Lilly Ledbetter Act.” It wrote:
In 2007, the Supreme Court had ruled in Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. that the 180-day statute of limitations started from the day an employer made the decision to discriminate — making it impossible for employees who learned of such discrimination later to get relief, such as back pay.
This is just wrong, and all PolitiFact had to do to debunk this claim was read the Supreme Court’s decision (which its commentary claims was one of the “sources” for its “fact check”), or various law review articles about it. Or just read my prior emails to them, which I sent to a legion of fact-checkers in September 2012, anticipating Obama would make this false claim, having made similar false claims in the past. This morning, I sent more emails — to each Politifact staffer listed as contributors to the Oct. 16 commentary. In response, I received an email from the principal author this morning, stating:
“Thanks for your email. I’ll look into it and talk about it with my editors. What I wrote was consistent with how we’ve described the case in the past.”
As of now, the error I identified has not been fixed. I suspect it won’t be, until it is too late to correct it in the print version of any newspaper that cites Politifact. So the error will live on in every news database as if it were fact.
Ledbetter did indeed lose her pay discrimination lawsuit because she filed her complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) much too late, long after the legal deadline. The Supreme Court said in most cases employees should file an EEOC complaint within 180 days of their first discriminatory paycheck, if they want to sue under the federal anti-discrimination law with the shortest deadline, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
But again, the Supreme Court didn’t say the deadline should be applied rigidly. Instead, it specifically left open the possibility employees could sue later simply because they didn’t know of the discrimination at the time — a situation it said did not apply to Ledbetter’s case (she testified in her deposition that she knew of the pay disparity in 1992, but filed her complaint with the EEOC in 1998, around the time she retired). The Court pointedly noted that the plaintiff could have pressed her claim instead under the Equal Pay Act, which has a longer deadline for suing.
(Moreover, as lawyer Paul Mirengoff observed, the Supreme Court has long allowed hoodwinked employees to rely on equitable tolling, waiver, and estoppel to sue beyond the deadline, when employer deception keeps them from suing within 180 days, as it made clear in its Zipes decision).
As Stuart Taylor pointed out in the National Journal:
Ledbetter admitted in her sworn deposition that “different people that I worked for along the way had always told me that my pay was extremely low” compared to her peers. She testified specifically that a superior had told her in 1992 that her pay was lower than that of other area managers, and that she had learned the amount of the difference by 1994 or 1995. She added that she had told her supervisor in 1995 that “I needed to earn an increase in pay” because “I wanted to get in line with where my peers were, because… at that time I knew definitely that they were all making a thousand [dollars] at least more per month than I was.”
After she lost her case, Ledbetter falsely claimed to Congress and the media that she had not learned of the discrimination until the end of her career — a claim parroted by gullible politicians and the press. (Tellingly, Ledbetter’s claim is found nowhere in the dissenting opinion in Ledbetter v. Goodyear, even though if it had been true, the dissenting justices surely would have cited it, since it would have given them a much stronger reason to rule in her favor).
But in Ledbetter’s deposition, under oath, she admitted she knew by 1992 – years earlier — that she was paid less than her male peers, as former EEOC lawyer David Copus noted long ago in a law review article no one has ever rebutted. (See Copus, Pay Discrimination Claims After Ledbetter, 75 Defense Counsel Journal 300, 305 (2008)).
Similarly, Washington lawyer Paul Mirengoff pointed out that:
Ledbetter testified that she knew by 1992 that her pay was out of line with her peers. In 1995, she spoke to her supervisor about the problem, telling him that “I knew definitely that they were all making a thousand at least more per month than I was and that I would like to get in line.” Yet Ledbetter waited until 1998 to file her EEOC complaint.
Moreover, although the Supreme Court did dismiss Ledbetter’s lawsuit under Title VII, the discrimination law with the shortest deadline, it pointed out the plaintiff could have prosecuted her discrimination claim instead under the Equal Pay Act, which has a longer deadline for suing. As it noted, “Petitioner, having abandoned her claim under the Equal Pay Act, asks us to deviate from our prior decisions in order to permit her to assert her claim under Title VII.” She might have won her case had she simply appealed based on the Equal Pay Act, which has a longer deadline (three years in most cases) and perhaps more generous rules for when the clock starts ticking on the statutory deadline for suing. Indeed, Supreme Court Justices suggested just that. See Ledbetter v. Goodyear, 550 U.S. at 640 (responding to Ledbetter’s observation that “lower courts routinely hear [EPA] claims challenging pay disparities that first arose outside the limitations period” by noting that “the EPA and Title VII are not the same”; “If Ledbetter had pursued her EPA claim, she would not face the Title VII obstacles that she now confronts”); Ledbetter, 550 U.S. at 658 n.8 (Ginsburg, J., dissenting) (“Under the EPA,” “a claim charging denial of equal pay accrues anew with each paycheck,” citing legal treatise).
(Under some other discrimination statutes, the deadline for suing restarts with each paycheck, allowing employees to sue even though they needlessly delayed in bringing their discrimination claim after learning about it. Justice Ginsburg’s dissent in the Ledbetter case argued that such an indulgent rule should be applied to Title VII intentional discrimination cases, like the one Ledbetter brought, as well. Under another provision of Title VII — the disparate-impact provision — the deadline starts running all over again with each paycheck, as the Supreme Court indicated in Lewis v. Chicago (2010), which held that under the disparate-impact provision — unlike the intentional-discrimination provision at issue in the Ledbetter case — the deadline does not run from the date a decision or policy is adopted, but rather restarts all over again each time the policy is applied, giving the plaintiff much more time to sue.).
Disclosure: I used to bring discrimination lawsuits for a living. I once worked on a pay discrimination lawsuit against a university
Michelle Robinson-Obama’s Harvard Law School Crony (JAQUELINE BERRIEN) Chair of the Rogue EEOC. Hand picked by the first family to sellout BLACK PEOPLE!
Please distribute this video exposing the “UGLY TRUTH” about the EEOC.
Thank you Ricardo for you contribution to this video.
HELP, HELP, HELP THIS IS AND URGENT REQUEST!! LYNCHINGS IN DOVER DE OF YOUNG BLACK MEN!!! I WAS PERSONALLY INVOLVED AT DSU WHEN POLICE ARRESTED DR. ISSA FOR SUPPORTING HIS BLACK STUDENTS PROTEST AGAINST LYNCHING AND REPLACEMENT OF BLACK PROFESSORS/STUDENTS WITH WHITES. THIS IS ALL CONNECTED TO THE WHITE HOUSE. THE VICE PRESIDENTS SON ” BO BIDEN ” DE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS PUSHING THE ARREST OF DR. ISSA.
THIS IS ALL CONNECT TO THE UNDERMINING OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY!!!
WHY HAS THE OBAMA ADMINSTRATION CUT-OUT SET-A-SIDES FOR HBCU’S?
Arthuretta Holmes-Martin v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Racial Discrimination, race, age, disability
THE ABOVE PHONY TRIAL SET-UP BY ATTORNEY GENERAL”ERIC HOLDER” TO COVER-UP STEALING FROM BLACK COLLEGE’S!
the plaintiff, an African-American woman, began working as the Deputy Director of the OSDBU, an office within the Department of Health and Human Services. Pl.’s Opp’n to Def.’s Renewed Mot. for Summ. J. (“Pl.’s Opp’n”) at 3. Her first line supervisor was Debbie Ridgely, a white female, the Director of the OSDBU. Id.
In 2004, Ridgely hired Clarence Randall, a white male, to serve as her “Special Advisor,” a position created, the plaintiff claims, to supersede the plaintiff’s position. Id. at 3. The plaintiff alleges that over the following months, Ridgely transferred many of the plaintiff’s responsibilities to Randall, such that Randall effectively assumed the role of Ridgely’s deputy.
OBAMA’S EEOC IN ATL HNIC FIRST LADIES FRIEND JACQUELINE BERRIEN CHAIR OF EEOC?
YOUNG BLACK WOMENS TREATMENT BY FIRST LADIES EEOC:
The Presidents appointee Jacqueline Berrien chair of EEOC is supporting “JIM-CROW II LAWS” at the Rogue EEOC. Black people are not equally qualified for employment by the non-enforcement of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 as amended by the EEOC. This is what Ms. Berrien has brought to the EEOC nation wide. Ms. Berrien has required the dismissal of a additional 50 complaint per investigator at all EEOC office. If any investigator refuses to dismiss the additional 50 complaints they with be disciplined.
Jacqueline Berrien made a deal with Senator Tom Harken of (IA) head of the senate committee that oversee’s the EEOC. The deal was dismiss all Black complaints and my committee will confirm you!
Check the stat’s a the eeoc. Yvette Clarke Representative Brooklyn (11) in the House and Miniority whip for Black Caucas was in on the deal.
The numbers don’t lie!!!
Jacqueline Berriens is Michelle Robinson-Obama’s Harvard Law School Friend!
Yvette Clarke House Representative from Brooklyn (11) NY is Jacqueline Berrien Oberlin College friend!
I recently had a charge dismissed by the Las Vegas, Nevada branch EEOC.
I received my Right to Sue Letter on 12-16-2012. I requested a copy of my
File charge from the EEOC which I received on 01-12-2013. Upon examining
the Summary of the Fact Finding Conference; I learned the EEOC Investigator
who swore us in and took the testimonies of the parties involved. Changed the
testimony that I gave and that of the witness that testified on my behalf. The
testimony he entered is a direct contradiction of the testimonies we gave and
all the documentation that was given to support my charge. I am currently waiting
to hear what the EEOC plans to do about this injustice.
Kevin you can’t recieve justice from a corrupt governement agency (EEOC). The right to sue means nothing from the EEOC when they have dismissed your complaint. You can file a law suit in federal district court Pro Se (without an attorney). If the evidence has been changed then file a Tort action against the EEOC and the investigator who changed the testimony. The investigators managers and attorneys at the EEOC told him to do this. Your employer has some influence at the EEOC. Expose them online on every blog on EEOC. You only have the court of public opinion on your side. The adminstrations appointee’s all have knowledge and/or are involved in this corruption and fraud against the public. My email is Ricohenry7@yahoo.com if you have further questions.
Ricardo Jones, Former Senior Federal Investigator EEOC-NYDO and Whistleblower against same.
Power of the People!
Hilda Solis Resigns After Accomplishments, Frustrations At Labor Department
Posted: 01/09/2013 6:34 pm EST | Updated: 01/10/2013 2:57 pm EST
After fixing the unemployment numbers for the Obama’s dirty work done. Hispanic community paid-off. DOL worse off then before she took over. Great Job Solis and Obama corruption against the Public.
It is clear that African-Americans, who have been hardest hit by unemployment despite educational gains, will have to compel this administration through activism to be included in the Obama Administration’s second term agenda. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36rk4rCPK9A
It is clear that African-Americans, who have been hardest hit by unemployment despite educational gains, will have to FORCE this administration through PROTEST PEACEFUL AND NON-PEACEFUL to be included in the Obama Administration’s second term agenda AND ALL PRESIDENCY. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36rk4rCPK9A
LETS NOT USE THE STRATEGY THAT LEAD TO THE END OF THE REVOLUTION AND/OR THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT!
WE’RE NOT LITTLE WHITE PEOPLE AND/OR JUNIOR WHITE PEOPLE! WE’RE BLACK AND OUR ISSUES ARE JOBS, JOBS AND JOBS.
WORLD ISSUES CAN COME LATER. WE MUST FIX OUR HOUSE FIRST!
POWER OF THE PEOPLE!
DUE PROCESS FOR BLACK PEOPLE ALL BLACK PEOPLE!
RICARDO JONES